Casey Ruble
My paintings explore the collisions between different systems of meaning-making. In our attempt to make sense of what Foucault called “the wild profusion of existing things,” we strive to identify similarities and differences between what are essentially abstract components, be they phonemes or colors, whole wordsor whole paintings. But meaning-making is a messy endeavor: A diagram of a World War II–era fighter jet formation looks more like a Frank Stella when seen in the context of a gallery exhibition. The crests once worn by Japanese soldiers lose their power as markers of identity and become purely decorative.The color green, which Mondrian loathed because of its reference to nature, today recalls computer innards as readily as it does grass. I am fascinated by what happens when we subject something organic(like a figure in motion or a narrative) to something systematic (like a geometric composition or a pattern): It is another means of ordering raw data, of interpreting the world around us. For me, a successful painting balances precariously between abstraction, symbolism, and representation. I like to think of these paintings as converging streams of thought: Eddies disrupt flow, undertows are formed, and new currents emerge in unpredictable directions.